top of page
eBook Digital Photography course
iBooks button
eBook Rome
iBooks button

ISO

PayPal ButtonPayPal Button

ISO (Signal amplification)

 

The word ISO is derived from analog cameras and was used to measure the film’s sensitivity to light. In low light conditions, film or a roll of film with a high ISO was used. With the advent of electronic sensors on the cameras, the sensitivity is an inherent feature of the sensor that cannot be changed like a roll of film because it is determined by the sensor, while ISO can be changed by the amplifier.

The light passes through the lens and reaches the electronic sensor that transforms it into an electric signal. The signal is then processed by the amplifier and is amplified. To increase the ISO in digital cameras means to increase the power of the signal with the amplifier. It is just like increasing the volume of a stereo. If we’re listening to a song and cannot understand the words, we can raise the volume to hear better. If the light is low, we can increase the ISO so that we can “see” better.

With music, increasing the volume of a song also increases our distortion, generating a “rustling” noise. In digital photography we often talk about ISO, but it would be better to speak of ISO equivalent (equivalent to the sensitivity of old rolls of film) or of amplification. However, we still express the ISO on digital SLR cameras using the same values that were used with rolls of film. So if the amplification of the signal reaches a level similar to that of the ISO sensitivity of a roll of film, it is given the same value.  The ISO values are not continuous numbers but are quantized in steps. Depending on the quality and price of the camera, there will be a range of more or less high ISO values available along with a variable number of “steps”. For example, when two cameras have an ISO range from 200 to 3200, this does not mean that the intervals for both cameras are the same. The most economical one may have ISO values of 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200 while the second model, the more expensive, may have 200, 250, 320, 400, 500, 640, 800, 1000, 1250, 1600, 2000, 2500, 3200. If the range is the same, having more steps is much better because, if it becomes necessary to increase the ISO, we could increase it little by little to avoid increasing the noise. In fact, if with both cameras we were at ISO 400 and we need to increase it, with the first, more economical, it would immediately at 800 while with the second, more expensive, it would be at 500, with all the benefits that we will see in detail later.

Besides having an ample subdivision of ISO values, it would also be advantageous to have a wider range of ISO values (such as 6400 or more). Having the ability to chose the amplification level of the signal is like having many different rolls of film with varying ISO’s at your disposal. This is very useful because with the simple push of a button, you can change the ISO at will, thus making the sensor more sensitive depending on the light conditions present.

With this in mind, what follows in the rest of this chapter applies only to the ISO of sensors in digital cameras, not for film.

Every reflex gives its best in terms of image sharpness to the lowest standard ISO. In order to understand this phenomenon, we have to introduce the concept of “electronic noise”. The electronic noise is generated by the sensor during the process of transforming the light to electricity.

This is a physical phenomenon that cannot be avoided. Sensors of various quality can have different signal/noise ratios, but every sensor will always have a certain electronic noise due to the various factors of how the sensor was constructed as well as the physics involved. The signal transformed into electricity produces noise. The signal amplification (using a higher ISO) also creates further noise. For example, let us use some fictitious numbers to illustrate this point. If we have an ISO value of 200, our signal would be 10 and our noise would have a value of 2 (a signal to noise ratio of 5). If we double our ISO to 400, our signal would be 20 with a noise of 4+1 (1 due to the amplification). We will have a total signal that is equal to 20 with a noise value that is equal to 5 but with a signal/noise ratio that is equal to 4. This is decidedly worse. If we further increase the amplification and bring our ISO value to 800, the signal will grow but so will the noise (see figure 01). While our image will be brighter, it will not be as “clean”. Returning to the stereo comparison, if we listen to the recording of a conference with noise in the background, we can raise the volume in order to try to better understand what is being said, but this will raise, at the same time, the background noise. In figure 02 we see a diagram of the percentages that shows in a more schematic and quicker way what is shown by the graphic in figure 01.

ISO/Noise ratio
Legend, key

Signal intensity

Electronic noise intensity

Noise intensity due to amplification

Total noise intensity

Signal/noise ratio

01 In this graphic we can see that as the ISO value increases, the electronic noise and the noise due to amplification also increases. The total noise, the red line, grows faster than the signal (indicated in green). In black we can see how, as the ISO value grows, the signal/noise ratio diminishes to the detriment of the cleanness of the same signal.

How appears noise in a photograph? Normally reflex cameras have sensors with a good signal/noise ratio and at ISO 200, 400, 640 we do not notice the noise. At higher ISO’s (depending on the quality of the sensor), we would see pixelation in dark areas that seems completely random. Shooting at night using a low ISO will give a photo that is dark but with a clean and black sky. If we use a higher ISO instead, the photo will be clearer, but the black sky will have more colored and scattered pixels everywhere (figures 03, 04, 05). If the noise is greater, the quality of the photo will be worse. In order to recognize the noise, it is enough take two photographs using extreme ISO’s (for example, one photo at 200 and the other at 3200) at night and to observe how the black sky appears in the photos.

Therefore, it is always important to use the lowest possible ISO value for your given situation. If you are shooting at night with little light, without having a tripod that is able to keep the digital camera stable, we will have to increase the ISO in order to work with the shortest time possible that will prevent the photo from becoming too blurry and will allow us to shoot freehand. In this way we will have details of the highest quality, and we will keep the noise as low as possible.

Reflex digital cameras usually have an ISO range of 200-3200, and they then have the possibility of going beyond with further increments indicated such as LO 0.3-0.7 or HI 0.3-0.7-1. LO 1 means that we are decreasing the ISO by a factor of 1 and therefore if from 200 we go to LO1, it means that are now at an ISO of 100. If instead we pass from 3200 HI1, we are now at 6400. While 0.3 and 0.7 are small steps. Why then is ISO 100 not indicated as LO1 ISO 200?

The answer is simple and comes from the sensor. Every sensor is constructed with its own intrinsic sensitivity. Then the signal amplifier does the rest. Therefore, LO1 in place of ISO 100 tells us that we are not utilizing the native sensitivity but are “amplifying” the reverse of it. In other words, we are lowering it. This process, though, generates additional noise. This tell us that the result will be better at an ISO of 200 than 100. To make another practical example, if our digital camera indicates an ISO of 200-3200 LO 0.3-1 HI 0.3-1 it means that we will have the best result at ISO 200 but we can comfortably reduce the ISO if we want because the reflex digital camera usually shows excellent signal/noise ratio between 100 and 800.

ISO/Noise ratio

02 In this graphic we are examining three elevated ISO values, and we can see how, by percent, the total noise (red) increases with respect to the signal (green) with the increase of the ISO. On the side of the red bar we can see two parts of the noise that contribute to the total noise. The black line represents the signal/noise ratio that worsens with the increase of the ISO.

High noise

03 Detail of the sky from a photo taken at night with a high ISO using a compact digital camera.

Mid noise

04 Detail of the sky from a photo taken at night with a low ISO using a compact digital camera.

No noise

05 Detail of the sky from a photo taken at night with a low ISO using a reflex digital camera.

In the three examples (03, 04, 05), we can see how the noise manifests itself. After having seen it, it will be easier to recognize it in your photographs. In figure 03, a compact digital camera has been used. It has a small sensor and generates more noise than a DSLR would. The photo was taken at night with an elevated ISO. The detail of the sky cropped from the photo demonstrates the colored pixels arranged casually. In figure 04, the digital camera is the same but a lower ISO has been used; the original photo was very dark but in this mode the noise is less evident. In figure 05, a semiprofessional reflex digital camera has been used with a low ISO value. We can see that the noise is unremarkable. By increasing the ISO to 800 or to a higher value, the noise would be visible but measurably reduced and very minor with respect to the previous figures (03, 04).

Iscriviti alla nostra mailing list

Non perdere mai un aggiornamento

bottom of page